We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In the current working draft, in section 20.3.4.
template<size_t I, class T1, class T2> constexpr tuple_element_t<I, std::pair<T1, T2>> &get(pair<T1, T2>&) noexcept;
The return type should be:
template<size_t I, class T1, class T2> constexpr typename tuple_element<I, std::pair<T1, T2>>::type &get(pair<T1, T2>&) noexcept;
Unless std::tuple_element_t<> will be added similar to the utilities in the <type_traits> header, in which case the definition should be added.
std::tuple_element_t<>
<type_traits>
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It appears to have been substituted unintentionally in 59d041e along with the new <type_traits> aliases.
Sorry, something went wrong.
f8d22fc
No branches or pull requests
In the current working draft, in section 20.3.4.
The return type should be:
Unless
std::tuple_element_t<>
will be added similar to the utilities in the<type_traits>
header, in which case the definition should be added.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: