Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

formatting for "E" variant marker in [algorithms] #2511

Closed
zygoloid opened this issue Nov 26, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

formatting for "E" variant marker in [algorithms] #2511

zygoloid opened this issue Nov 26, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@zygoloid
Copy link
Member

@jensmaurer wrote on #2501:

The algorithms now define a placeholder $E$ to deal with the subvariants of an algorithm (with/without comparator etc.) Very often, this $E$ is an actual C++ expression, so (per our standing rules) should be \tcode{E}. Except for a very few places where we need a parameter and $E(x)$ is used. In the latter cases, \placeholder{E} would be appropriate (similar to the other description meta-functions such as INVOKE). However, using \tcode in one situation and \placeholder in the next seems sub-optimal, too.

@zygoloid zygoloid added the decision-required A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required. label Nov 26, 2018
@jensmaurer jensmaurer changed the title formatting for "E" variant marker in algorithms formatting for "E" variant marker in [algorithms] Nov 26, 2018
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

Editorial meeting:

  • Formatting E as math-mode $E$ is correct.
  • We should consider replacing \placeholder with math-mode in similar situations.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer removed the decision-required A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required. label Feb 22, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants