New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[temp.func.order] Adjust example to rules in [temp.deduct.partial]. #2571

Merged

zygoloid merged 1 commit into cplusplus:master from jensmaurer:b17

Dec 7, 2018

Member

jensmaurer commented Dec 7, 2018

Fixes #2559.


          [temp.func.order] Adjust example to rules in [temp.deduct.partial].

14970a2

zygoloid merged commit de10939 into cplusplus:master

jensmaurer deleted the b17 branch

December 7, 2018 23:01

xskxzr commented Dec 8, 2018 •

edited

After this change, this example seems to make no sense for (or even conflict with) the wording in [temp.func.order]/5:

Note: Since partial ordering in a call context considers only parameters for which there are explicit call arguments, some parameters are ignored ...

What about deleting this paragraph and moving these examples into corresponding paragraphs in [temp.deduct.partial]?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment