Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[reverse.iter.nonmember] Replace data member access with accessor #2579

Closed
JohelEGP opened this issue Dec 8, 2018 · 0 comments
Closed

[reverse.iter.nonmember] Replace data member access with accessor #2579

JohelEGP opened this issue Dec 8, 2018 · 0 comments
Assignees
@jensmaurer

Comments

@JohelEGP
Copy link
Contributor

JohelEGP commented Dec 8, 2018

New wording seems to avoid describing non-member functions by accessing would-be private/protected data members, so it seems reasonable to update [reverse.iter.nonmember] to use .base() instead of .current. In fact, you'll notice that the return type of the first function uses .base().
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jensmaurer jensmaurer

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@JohelEGP @jensmaurer