Skip to content

[reverse.iter.nonmember] Replace data member access with accessor #2579

Closed
@JohelEGP

Description

@JohelEGP

New wording seems to avoid describing non-member functions by accessing would-be private/protected data members, so it seems reasonable to update [reverse.iter.nonmember] to use .base() instead of .current. In fact, you'll notice that the return type of the first function uses .base().

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

      Participants

      @JohelEGP@jensmaurer

      Issue actions

        [reverse.iter.nonmember] Replace data member access with accessor · Issue #2579 · cplusplus/draft