Skip to content

Meaning of "Return Type" not specified in [structure.specifications] #266

New issue
New issue
Closed
Closed
Meaning of "Return Type" not specified in [structure.specifications]#266
@K-ballo

Description

@K-ballo
K-ballo
opened on Feb 8, 2014
Contributor

The current draft contains 14 occurrences of a \returntype clause. That clause is not covered by 17.5.1.4/3 [structure.specifications].

Activity

jwakely

jwakely commented on Mar 12, 2015

@jwakely
jwakely
on Mar 12, 2015
Member

(All occurrences are in Clause 30)

jensmaurer

jensmaurer commented on Nov 12, 2016

@jensmaurer
jensmaurer
on Nov 12, 2016
Member

Asked lwgchar@gmail.com to open an LWG issue.

jensmaurer

jensmaurer commented on Nov 13, 2016

@jensmaurer
jensmaurer
on Nov 13, 2016
Member

LWG 2819
http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-active.html#2819

jensmaurer
closed this as completedon Nov 13, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

        Participants

        @jwakely@K-ballo@jensmaurer

        Issue actions
          Meaning of "Return Type" not specified in [structure.specifications] · Issue #266 · cplusplus/draft