Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Motions 2019 02 cwg 1 #2736

Merged
merged 16 commits into from Mar 8, 2019
Merged

Motions 2019 02 cwg 1 #2736

merged 16 commits into from Mar 8, 2019

Conversation

burblebee
Copy link
Contributor

@burblebee burblebee commented Mar 5, 2019 •
edited

Fixes #2681.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added this to the post-2019-02 milestone Mar 5, 2019
Dawn Perchik and others added 16 commits March 7, 2019 18:28
@zygoloid
CWG2256 Lifetime of trivially-destructible objects
f3a6b2e 
[basic.life]p1 Add "a" before the array.
@zygoloid
CWG2267 Copy-initialization of temporary in reference direct-initiali…
b0248ef 
…zation

[dcl.init.list] Fix example of reference list-initialization to use
list-initialization.
@zygoloid
CWG2278 Copy elision in constant expressions reconsidered
a4154ab
@zygoloid
CWG2303 Partial ordering and recursive variadic inheritance
a429e43
@zygoloid
CWG2309 Restrictions on nested statements within constexpr functions
f5b40a0
@zygoloid
CWG2310 Type completeness and derived-to-base pointer conversions
afbe0ec
@zygoloid
[expr.static.cast] Fix wording of CWG2310 to match CWG intent (verified
f4346ec 
on core reflector):

 - in p11, require D to be a complete class type, not B
 - in p12, rephrase to avoid the suggestion that we're talking about a
   different D than the one already in scope
@zygoloid
CWG2317 Self-referential default member initializers
3cee0de
@zygoloid
CWG2318 Nondeduced contexts in deduction from a braced-init-list
0d03551
@zygoloid
CWG2330 Missing references to variable templates
3b5f554 
[temp.spec] Added Oxford commas.
@zygoloid
CWG2332 template-name as simple-type-name vs injected-class-name
8d6502d
@zygoloid
[dcl.type.simple] Fix inaccurate note added by CWG2332
502e419 
[temp.local] Clarify that the surrounding syntax and construct directly
dictates whether an injected-class-name is syntactically a template-name
or a type-name, not just what it means.
@zygoloid
CWG2336 Destructor characteristics vs potentially-constructed subobjects
98d7e6e
@zygoloid
CWG2352 Similar types and reference binding
73fea44
@zygoloid
CWG2358 Explicit capture of value
9f5c64c
@zygoloid
CWG2360 [[maybe_unused]] and structured bindings
27f5ad5
@zygoloid
Copy link
Member

zygoloid commented Mar 8, 2019

Force-pushed with some fixes:

CWG2267: Use list-init syntax for example (fixing CWG wording) -- fix confirmed with CWG
CWG2309: Fixed bad indexing markup in [stmt.stmt]
CWG2310: [expr.static.cast]p11: CWG added "complete" in the wrong place, p12: "of a complete class D" doesn't make sense because we already introduced D earlier in the sentence -- fix confirmed with CWG
CWG2318: Improved formatting for P'_i
CWG2330: Was missing third change
CWG2331: Change dropped; returned to CWG for redrafting. Wording is incorrect and intended to fix an editorial issue (my fault; my analysis in #1169 is wrong)
CWG2332: Editorially fixed incorrect note and clarified normative wording -- fix confirmed with CWG
CWG2360: Was missing second addition

@zygoloid zygoloid merged commit 0621b29 into master Mar 8, 2019
@burblebee
Copy link
Contributor Author

@zygoloid thanks so much for fixing my misses! would be great to point out what those misses are in the future tho so I can learn from them! might that be possible?

@JohelEGP
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like you're looking for the force-pushed link above his comment.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer deleted the motions-2019-02-cwg-1 branch October 19, 2019 20:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
post-2019-02
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
4 participants
@burblebee @zygoloid @JohelEGP @jensmaurer