New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
reconsider placeholder formatting in [expr.await] #2774
Comments
Concretely, we should consider upright teletype for these placeholders: P and Z (types), and e and h (objects). p, a, o, await-ready, await-suspend, and await-resume are all macros for a specific syntactic construct, so italics for those seems appropriate. |
It's not clear what to do with s in /5.1, which is "a value". But then we talk about a call "s
Fitting that into the surrounding bullet may require some massaging of the text. |
e and h are nebulous -- e is an lvalue, and h should probably be a prvalue, so they're both syntax-macro-esque. |
Waiting for #2770. |
[expr.await] uses placeholders for names of various expressions, types, etc used in its exposition. We should consider whether plain teletype would be a better choice for some of those placeholders (in particular, the ones that simply denote types rather than being syntactic macros for a choice of one of two forms of expression).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: