Also, this paragraph is horribly hard to read, and some more formatting here would help a lot. Maybe add codeblocks for the "out = ..." expressions.

(not a reply - just being lazy...)

About the C++ spec...

The latexmk build is stopping with a ? prompt that I needed to cntl-C out
of - hope this wasn't my doing! Can you please check? If it is my
doing, what did I do wrong?

Also, might not be a bad idea for someone to review my changes to make sure
I applied them correctly (as this is my first time editing the spec).

FYI - I've been working off and on on the CWG motion 1 issues. Just checked
in the fix for issue 1740. I could probably do a few more of the CWG motion
1 issues... I skipped issues #1609 and #1692, as there was no wording;
just a comment saying "resolved by 1691".

Richard, I tried to set up an IRC chat connection to you, but... what's the
server address I should use?? I'm burblebee on aim and skype.

Thanks,
-Dawn

On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:45:31AM -0800, Richard Smith wrote:

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#279

Hi Richard,

So I've made it throught the list of motion 1 issues.
In summary, the following issues were skipped:

• 1612 (referenced text no longer exists)
• 1690 (no wording - resolved by 1691)
• 1692 (no wording - resolved by 1691)
• 1762 (already applied?)

Please review my changes for these and the motion 4 issues, to
make sure I did them correctly, since this is my first time editing
the spec.

Thanks,
-Dawn