Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch to using constant-width italics for exposition-only names in the core wording #2792

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 15, 2019

Conversation

zygoloid
Copy link
Member

We already used this typeface for exposition-only identifiers in the
library wording.

Fixes #2783.

@zygoloid zygoloid requested a review from tkoeppe March 15, 2019 05:57
@jensmaurer jensmaurer added the needs rebase The pull request needs a git rebase to resolve merge conflicts. label Mar 15, 2019
@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Mar 15, 2019

Can we make something like \tcode{\exposid{promise}.unhandled_exception() work, i.e. permit exposid to appear inside a tcode?

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

@tkoeppe, I think that already works (and is used in the patch).

Copy link
Contributor

@tkoeppe tkoeppe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, subject to improved nesting.

core wording.

We already used this typeface for exposition-only identifiers in the
library wording.

Fixes cplusplus#2783.
@zygoloid zygoloid removed the needs rebase The pull request needs a git rebase to resolve merge conflicts. label Mar 15, 2019
@zygoloid zygoloid merged commit b9df38f into cplusplus:master Mar 15, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants