Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[range.prim.size] Missing "respectively" #2794

Closed
JohelEGP opened this issue Mar 16, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2899
Closed

[range.prim.size] Missing "respectively" #2794

JohelEGP opened this issue Mar 16, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2899
Assignees

Comments

@JohelEGP
Copy link
Contributor

  • Otherwise, (ranges::end(E) - ranges::begin(E)) if it is a valid expression and the types I and S of ranges::begin(E) and ranges::end(E) model SizedSentinel<S, I> ([iterator.concept.sizedsentinel]) and ForwardIterator<I>.
    However, E is evaluated only once.
  • I don't remember similar wording not including "respectively", so I'd guess this wording allows the interpretation of S denoting ranges::begin(E) and I denoting ranges::end(E).

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    None yet
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

    2 participants