Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Library-wide: Use "model" instead of "satisfy" with library concept r… #2797

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jun 14, 2019

Conversation

CaseyCarter
Copy link
Contributor

…equirements

Updates: [structure.requirements],[customization.point.object],[res.on.requirements],[concepts], and [range.semi.wrap].

Fixes #2591.

source/concepts.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source/lib-intro.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
…equirements

Updates: [structure.requirements],[customization.point.object],[res.on.requirements],[concepts], and [range.semi.wrap].

Fixes cplusplus#2591.
source/concepts.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source/concepts.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source/concepts.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@jwakely jwakely left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I find this pull request very satisfactory.

@zygoloid zygoloid merged commit b3b1f63 into cplusplus:master Jun 14, 2019
@CaseyCarter CaseyCarter deleted the model branch June 15, 2019 01:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[concepts] Use "model" instead of "satisfy" for the semantic requirements
3 participants