Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[expos.only.func] Add library index entry for decay-copy #2841

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 30, 2019

Conversation

AlisdairM
Copy link
Contributor

Following the same principle as locating GENERALIZED_SUM in
the library index, add an entry for the exposition-only function
decay-copy, which is used to specify several parts of the library
quite remote from where it is now defined.

Following the same principle as locating GENERALIZED_SUM in
the library index, add an entry for the exposition-only function
decay-copy, which is used to specify several parts of the library
quite remote from where it is now defined.
Copy link
Member

@jwakely jwakely left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, but should we also index the various uses of it?

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

We don't consistently index the use of defined terms. For example, we don't index all uses of "odr-use", either.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer merged commit 4a5be93 into cplusplus:master Apr 30, 2019
@AlisdairM AlisdairM deleted the index_decay_copy branch November 14, 2023 19:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants