[basic.compound] Replace four refs with a single one to [dcl.meaning] #2906
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I'd much prefer to simply refer to [dcl.meaning] instead of enumerating each subclause individually. |
|
Ok I'll push an update shortly. |
jwakely
force-pushed
the
basic.compound-refs
branch
from
ee495da
to
2218cdf
Compare
|
Updated, so it now says:
|
jensmaurer
changed the title
jensmaurer
approved these changes
May 29, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently the cross references to 9.2.3.[1245] are not in numerical order, which just looks odd:
It seems like 9.2.3.3 [dcl.mptr] also mentions a restriction:
Should [dcl.mptr] be added to the list of refs in [basic.compound] p2?