Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[conv.qual]/5 and footnote 67 are near-identical #2924

Closed
W-E-Brown opened this issue Jun 10, 2019 · 2 comments · Fixed by #3148
Closed

[conv.qual]/5 and footnote 67 are near-identical #2924

W-E-Brown opened this issue Jun 10, 2019 · 2 comments · Fixed by #3148
Assignees
@jensmaurer

Comments

@W-E-Brown
Copy link
Contributor

Do we need both [conv.qual]/5 and footnote 67?

[conv.qual]/5 says: "[Note: Function types (including those used in pointer to member function types) are never cv-qualified (9.2.3.5). —end note]"

Footnote 67 says: "Function types (including those used in pointer-to-member-function types) are never cv-qualified; see 9.2.3.5."

(FWIW, I prefer to keep the Note, but with the footnote's "pointer-to-member-function" hyphenation.)
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

Footnote 67 is in [expr.static.cast], thus far away from [conv.qual] p5. I do support turning footnote 67 into a note, though.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added the decision-required A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required. label Jun 11, 2019
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

Editorial meeting: Turn footnote into a note; consistently use hyphenation from the footnote and xref style from the note.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer removed the decision-required A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required. label Jul 16, 2019
@jensmaurer jensmaurer self-assigned this Aug 6, 2019
@jensmaurer jensmaurer mentioned this issue Aug 6, 2019
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jensmaurer jensmaurer

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

[conv.qual,expr.static.cast] Harmonize notes on cv-qualified function… jensmaurer/draft
2 participants
@W-E-Brown @jensmaurer