We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
We have inconsistent wording in [stringbuf] like:
created with which & ios_base::out being nonzero
which & ios_base::out
(the example above was altered by #978)
only if (mode & ios_base::out) != 0
(mode & ios_base::out) != 0
and [tab:stringbuf.seekoff.pos].
Several new cases are being added by P0408.
We have a term of art for saying this, defined in [bitmask.types]. We can say "if ios_base::out is set in mode".
ios_base::out
mode
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
jensmaurer
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
We have inconsistent wording in [stringbuf] like:
(the example above was altered by #978)
and [tab:stringbuf.seekoff.pos].
Several new cases are being added by P0408.
We have a term of art for saying this, defined in [bitmask.types]. We can say "if
ios_base::out
is set inmode
".The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: