Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inconsistent use of "in this section" vs "in this sub-clause" #307

Closed
jwakely opened this issue Jun 5, 2014 · 3 comments
Closed

Inconsistent use of "in this section" vs "in this sub-clause" #307

jwakely opened this issue Jun 5, 2014 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@jwakely
Copy link
Member

jwakely commented Jun 5, 2014

"In this section" is far more common, but we have the following mentions of sub-clauses:

[expr.const]
[meta.unary]
[meta.unary.prop.query]
[meta.rel]
[meta.trans]
[meta.numerics]
[rand.eng]
[futures.state]

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

"in this section" - 32
"in this subclause" - 38

ISO seems to prefer "in this subclause"
Richard?

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added the decision-required A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required. label Nov 15, 2016
@zygoloid
Copy link
Member

zygoloid commented Mar 2, 2017

In an ISO standard, the correct term is "subclause".

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

jensmaurer commented Mar 2, 2017

Editorial meeting consensus: The term is "subclause" without hyphen. See ISO Directives Part 2, 6.1.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer removed the decision-required A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required. label Mar 2, 2017
jensmaurer added a commit to jensmaurer/draft that referenced this issue Mar 28, 2017
The ISO Directives, Part 2, prescribe the term 'subclause'.

Fixes cplusplus#307.
@jensmaurer jensmaurer self-assigned this Mar 28, 2017
jensmaurer added a commit to jensmaurer/draft that referenced this issue Jul 21, 2017
The ISO Directives, Part 2, prescribe the term 'subclause'.

Fixes cplusplus#307.
jensmaurer added a commit to jensmaurer/draft that referenced this issue Jul 30, 2017
The ISO Directives, Part 2, prescribe the term 'subclause'.

Fixes cplusplus#307.
jensmaurer added a commit to jensmaurer/draft that referenced this issue Oct 13, 2017
The ISO Directives, Part 2, prescribe the term 'subclause'.

Fixes cplusplus#307.
jensmaurer added a commit to jensmaurer/draft that referenced this issue Oct 13, 2017
The ISO Directives, Part 2, prescribe the term 'subclause'.

Also remove overview sub-headings for non-normative
subclause overview text.

Fixes cplusplus#307.
jensmaurer added a commit to jensmaurer/draft that referenced this issue Oct 16, 2017
The ISO Directives, Part 2, prescribe the term 'subclause'.

Also remove overview sub-headings for non-normative
subclause overview text.

Fixes cplusplus#307.
jensmaurer added a commit to jensmaurer/draft that referenced this issue Oct 17, 2017
The ISO Directives, Part 2, prescribe the term 'subclause'.

Also remove overview sub-headings for non-normative
subclause overview text.

Fixes cplusplus#307.
jensmaurer added a commit to jensmaurer/draft that referenced this issue Nov 12, 2017
The ISO Directives, Part 2, prescribe the term 'subclause'.

Also remove overview sub-headings for non-normative
subclause overview text.

Fixes cplusplus#307.
jensmaurer added a commit to jensmaurer/draft that referenced this issue Nov 12, 2017
The ISO Directives, Part 2, prescribe the term 'subclause'.

Also remove overview sub-headings for non-normative
subclause overview text.

Fixes cplusplus#307.
zygoloid pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 12, 2017
The ISO Directives, Part 2, prescribe the term 'subclause'.

Also remove overview sub-headings for non-normative
subclause overview text.

Fixes #307.
AaronBallman pushed a commit to AaronBallman/draft that referenced this issue Nov 15, 2017
The ISO Directives, Part 2, prescribe the term 'subclause'.

Also remove overview sub-headings for non-normative
subclause overview text.

Fixes cplusplus#307.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants