Motions 2019 07 cwg 1 #3070
Merged
Motions 2019 07 cwg 1 #3070
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added 9 commits
August 1, 2019 19:02
[basic.stc.dynamic.allocation] Removed superflous "then"s from bullets.
[basic.def.odr] Replaced , with ; in bullets for consistency.
Note that this wording changed in this issue was also changed by CWG2366.
zygoloid
force-pushed
the
motions-2019-07-cwg-1
branch
from
8e8bfe7
to
afa2e86
Compare
|
@zygoloid about your changes:
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
P1510R0 Core Language Working Group "tentatively ready" Issues for the July, 2019 (Cologne) meeting
Fixes #2980.
Notes:
*CWG1839: This issue was in tentatively ready status so was added, but it is not in P1510R0, so was reverted in a Fixup.
*CWG1839: FYI - wording changed since proposal was written.
*CWG2300: Poor wording in change to 1st bullet of [basic.def.odr] p12:
We "considered" "the definition of a closure type" to "consist of the sequence of tokens of the corresponding /lambda-expression/" ??
*CWG2366: In [expr.const] p2, what is "the initialization full-expression" ??
*CWG2406: In [dcl.attr.fallthrough]p3, how can an iteration statement contain a
fallthrough statement?