New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
P1135R6 The C++20 synchronization library #3093
Conversation
Note for P1643R1 Add wait/notify to atomic_ref: The wording keeps talking about |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
review summary for 1st paper P1135R6: wording is bad, but edits are bad too.
sorry i can't finish this review right now - will try and find some time later... |
192139b
to
baa28ed
Compare
- [atomics.wait] Make singular.
to `expected`. The parameter is not a phase count, and is referred to by other normative wording as `expected`; also, `expected` is the name we use for the same parameter in the constructor of `latch`.
baa28ed
to
d5272de
Compare
Fixes #3013.