Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

P0408R7 Efficient Access to basic_stringbuf ’s Buffer #3109

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Aug 6, 2019

Conversation

burblebee
Copy link
Contributor

@burblebee burblebee commented Jul 31, 2019

Fixes #3018.

Notes:

  • Wording says:
    "Add a conditional noexcept specification to swap with see below:"
    but "see below" is not used in the wording for this swap member.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer changed the title P0408R7 (Motions 2019 07 lwg 14) P0408R7 Efficient Access to basic_stringbuf ’s Buffer Jul 31, 2019
source/iostreams.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source/iostreams.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source/iostreams.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@burblebee
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jensmaurer @jwakely Can one of you re-review and approve please?

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

There's a button next to the name under "Reviewers" to request a re-review.

@zygoloid zygoloid force-pushed the motions-2019-07-lwg-14 branch 2 times, most recently from d42d29c to 64c34ca Compare August 6, 2019 00:18
Dawn Perchik added 3 commits August 5, 2019 17:21
Fixed punctuation in \effects clauses.
[stringbuf] Omitted duplicate constructor in synopsis.
[stringbuf.cons] Added missing const on string parameter in itemdecl of
    basic_stringbuf to match declaration in synopsis.

Fixes #3018.
…cy and to avoid confusion with "str" methods.
"str()" should be "str"; we're talking about all str member functions here.
Add comma after "For efficiency reasons".
"i.e." -> "e.g." since we're describing an example case.
@zygoloid zygoloid merged commit b376d76 into master Aug 6, 2019
@jensmaurer jensmaurer deleted the motions-2019-07-lwg-14 branch December 15, 2019 19:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[2019-07 LWG Motion 14] P0408R7 Efficient Access to basic_stringbuf ’s Buffer
4 participants