Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

review [iterator.concepts] for proper use of \itemdescr #3120

Open
zygoloid opened this issue Aug 4, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

review [iterator.concepts] for proper use of \itemdescr #3120

zygoloid opened this issue Aug 4, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@zygoloid
Copy link
Member

zygoloid commented Aug 4, 2019

Whether all, some, or none of the description of a concept is indented by \itemdescr seems to vary pretty randomly throughout [iterator.concepts].

We should also consider whether we want a Modeled: element to describe the circumstances under which the concept is modeled.
@jensmaurer jensmaurer added decision-required A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required. lwg Issue must be reviewed by LWG. labels Aug 7, 2019
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

This seems to ask for coordination with LWG.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added decision-required A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required. and removed decision-required A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required. labels Sep 10, 2019
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

jensmaurer commented Sep 30, 2019 •
edited

Editorial teleconference: Have a concrete proposal, then present to LWG. Having "\itemdescr" and "Modeled:" seems reasonable.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer removed decision-required A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required. lwg Issue must be reviewed by LWG. labels Sep 30, 2019
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

See also #2648.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@zygoloid @jensmaurer