You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think this is to mirror the presentation in [over.match.copy] which has a very similar "the candidate functions are selected as follows:" sentence followed by a two-bullet list. Using similar formats for those three paragraphs is nice, although I agree that a one-bullet list is ugly now that we number the bullets.
Editorial teleconference: No general prohibition against single-item bulleted lists. Review individual bulleted lists that are objectionable. [over.match.conv] and [over.match.conv] are fine.
[over.match.funcs] p5: fix by removing "an additional rule applies" and remove bullet.
For example:
draft/source/overloading.tex
Line 1381 in 1739050
draft/source/overloading.tex
Line 1431 in 1739050
These look pretty weird. I think a "let's avoid single-item lists" rule would probably make sense for the Specification Style Guidelines wiki page. :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: