Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[intro.compliance] Fix reference in footnote #3192

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 6, 2019

Conversation

danra
Copy link
Collaborator

@danra danra commented Aug 21, 2019

It seems this footnote is supposed to point at [intro.abstract] which describes how the implementation's documentations also defines implementation-defined behavior; In the same way that the footnote in [intro.abstract] points into [intro.compliance] where it says that the documentation also includes things which are listed there.

It seems this footnote is supposed to point at [intro.abstract] which describes how the implementation's documentations also defines implementation-defined behavior; In the same way that the footnote in [intro.abstract] points into [intro.compliance] where it says that the documentation also includes things which are listed there.
@zygoloid zygoloid merged commit 97977a1 into cplusplus:master Oct 6, 2019
JohelEGP added a commit to JohelEGP/draft that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2021
This is similar to cplusplus#3192,
but recognizes that the sibling subclause
should be the destination of the reference,
which covers
conditionally-supported constructs and
locale-specific characteristics.
JohelEGP added a commit to JohelEGP/draft that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2021
This is similar to cplusplus#3192,
but recognizes that the sibling subclause
should be the destination of the reference,
which covers
conditionally-supported constructs and
locale-specific characteristics.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants