[class.spaceship] equal to equivalent #3220
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jwakely
approved these changes
Sep 11, 2019
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a correct application of the wording from http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p1186r3.html#wording but since there is no such member of the weak_ordering class I think the intent is obvious, and so this qualifies as editorial.
|
@brevzin please take a look. |
|
Looks good to me! 🤦♂ |
jensmaurer
approved these changes
Sep 18, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
typo fix for [class.spaceship]/1.4