You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
#3350 just changed an occurrence of "This subclause" to "Subclause \ref{parent subclause}". There are many other such occurrences of "This subclause" in introductory paragraphs such as .general and .pre[amble] that actually mean the parent subclause. Should those be changed accordingly?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Top-level clauses' introductions already use the technically correct "This Clause". This direction seems desirable to me.
JohelEGP
changed the title
[lib] This subclause vs Subclase \ref{parent subclause}
[lib] Refer to subclause being introduced rather than "this subclause"
Nov 7, 2019
#3350 just changed an occurrence of "This subclause" to "Subclause \ref{parent subclause}". There are many other such occurrences of "This subclause" in introductory paragraphs such as .general and .pre[amble] that actually mean the parent subclause. Should those be changed accordingly?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: