Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

CWG 1924: Definition of “literal” and kinds of literals #3373

Open
jensmaurer opened this issue Nov 5, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

CWG 1924: Definition of “literal” and kinds of literals #3373

jensmaurer opened this issue Nov 5, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

jensmaurer commented Nov 5, 2019 •
edited

The term “literal” is used without definition except for the implicit connection with the syntactic nonterminal literal. The relationships of English terms to syntactic nonterminals (such as “integer literal” and integer-literal) should be examined throughout 5.13 [lex.literal] and its subsections.

CWG in Belfast: handle editorially
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member Author

This is mostly subsumed by #3636.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@jensmaurer