Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Simplify incoming initialization sequencing #3381

Open
opensdh opened this issue Nov 7, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Simplify incoming initialization sequencing #3381

opensdh opened this issue Nov 7, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
cwg Issue must be reviewed by CWG.

Comments

@opensdh
Copy link
Contributor

opensdh commented Nov 7, 2019

The new text

the definition of V is appearance-ordered before the definition of W

is unnecessary; the "every definition" wording is adequate even for non-inline variables.
@jensmaurer jensmaurer added the decision-required A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required. label Nov 20, 2019
@zygoloid
Copy link
Member

As noted on the core reflector, there's a normative problem here too: we should apply the 'every definition' wording for all pairs of variables V, W for which neither has unsequenced initialization. If CWG is about to change the wording anyway, it's probably best for us to leave it alone.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added cwg Issue must be reviewed by CWG. and removed decision-required A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required. labels Nov 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
cwg Issue must be reviewed by CWG.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@zygoloid @jensmaurer @opensdh