Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Restructure [utilities] #3388

Closed
jensmaurer opened this issue Nov 8, 2019 · 6 comments
Closed

Restructure [utilities] #3388

jensmaurer opened this issue Nov 8, 2019 · 6 comments
Projects
C++23 clause renumbering
Milestone
C++23

Comments

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

jensmaurer commented Nov 8, 2019 •
edited

Ideas from Belfast editorial session:

  • Utility types: pair, tuple, variant, optional, any, bitset
  • Memory management: memory, smart Pointers, memory resource, scoped_allocator-adaptor,
  • Compile-time programming: type_traits, ratio
@jensmaurer jensmaurer added this to the C++23 milestone Nov 10, 2019
@jensmaurer jensmaurer moved this from Done to Open in C++23 clause renumbering Nov 10, 2019
@jensmaurer jensmaurer mentioned this issue Nov 10, 2019
Closed
@jensmaurer jensmaurer mentioned this issue Nov 14, 2020
Closed
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member Author

Move [format] to [strings], since it's essentially a fancy string constructor.

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member Author

Move [stacktrace] to [diagnostics].

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member Author

keep Utility types: pair, tuple, variant, optional, any, bitset under [utilities], but create a new grouping subclause called "data types".

@JohelEGP
Copy link
Contributor

Isn't "[charconv] Primitive numeric conversions" a good fit for Clause 26 "Numerics library"? I always searched there for it, at first.

@jwakely
Copy link
Member

jwakely commented Jul 16, 2021

Should [intseq] "Compile-time integer sequences" be a subclause of [utility] "Utility components" rather than a sibling?

@jensmaurer jensmaurer mentioned this issue Nov 23, 2021
Closed
8 tasks
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member Author

Addressed with #5124

C++23 clause renumbering automation moved this from Open to Done Feb 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
C++23 clause renumbering
  
Done
Milestone
C++23
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@jwakely @JohelEGP @jensmaurer