New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
'voidify' is not indexed #3392
Comments
So, what's our indexing policy for such exposition-only names? |
Editorial meeting: Have a separate section in the library names index for exposition-only names. |
It's not obvious how to obtain a separate, named section in the library names index. |
Editorial meeting: Have exposition-only concepts in the concept index (status quo). Have other exposition-only names (e.g. voidify) in the general library names index. Add intro text to say that italics names are exposition-only. |
It's defined and used in [specialized.algorithms] but not in any index.
The similar exposition-only function
decay-copy
is in the Index of Library Names, although I'm not sure if that's a good idea (most things in that index are reserved by the implementation, so cannot be used as macros by users, but that isn't true ofvoidify
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: