You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Sorry, it seems that this constructor makes more sense without const. This constructor should be selected when the argument is of type void*. But if the parameter is const T* then template<class T> basic_format_arg(const T&) is a better match.
What we did editorially is making the synopsis identical to the function definition. Sorry that this seemingly went the wrong way.
Please feel free to have an LWG issue created, but reverting the editorial fix would re-introduce the inconsistency, which seems to make the situation worse.
An exposition-only constructor of
basic_format_arg
is declared asdraft/source/utilities.tex
Lines 21583 to 21584 in 6deb181
in the class template definition, but
const
is missing in the description:draft/source/utilities.tex
Line 21739 in 6deb181
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: