[defns.access] Clarify definition of "access". #3470
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Dani-Hub
reviewed
Nov 16, 2019
|
What was really missing is [conv.lval] saying that it may introduce a read. |
jensmaurer
added
the
changes requested
jensmaurer
requested changes
Nov 16, 2019
Add cross-linking between the places that introduce accesses and the definition of the term, and add a note explaining that we only ever access objects of scalar type.
zygoloid
force-pushed
the
clarify-access
branch
from
1610524
to
cf90f52
Compare
zygoloid
removed
the
changes requested
jensmaurer
approved these changes
Nov 19, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add cross-linking between the places that introduce accesses and the
definition of the term, and add a note explaining that we only ever
access objects of scalar type.