Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[range.adaptors] Base vs base-t #3561

Closed
JohelEGP opened this issue Dec 16, 2019 · 2 comments · Fixed by #3857
Closed

[range.adaptors] Base vs base-t #3561

JohelEGP opened this issue Dec 16, 2019 · 2 comments · Fixed by #3857
Assignees
@jensmaurer

Comments

@JohelEGP
Copy link
Contributor

P1035 "Input range adaptors" used base_t (in elements_view and take_while_view) where the other views used Base. Which way to go?
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

Asked LWG which way to go: http://lists.isocpp.org/lib/2019/12/14918.php

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added the decision-required A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required. label Jan 10, 2020
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

Editorial meeting: It's like a template parameter. Use "Base" (italics).

@jensmaurer jensmaurer removed the decision-required A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required. label Feb 10, 2020
@CaseyCarter CaseyCarter mentioned this issue Feb 19, 2020
Merged
@jensmaurer jensmaurer self-assigned this Mar 10, 2020
@jensmaurer jensmaurer mentioned this issue Mar 10, 2020
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jensmaurer jensmaurer

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

[range.take.while.sentinel,range.elements.iterator] Rename exposition… jensmaurer/draft
2 participants
@JohelEGP @jensmaurer