[lex.operators] Add co_await to the list
#3645
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
`co_await` is missing from the list of _preprocessing-op-or-punc_. Since it is an operator like `new` and `delete` (see [over.oper]), it should be here, otherwise it would be an identifier in phases 3 through 6. This is a clear inconsistency. (I'm not certain about how to layout the table, as `co_await` is almost too big to fit, but the existing patterns should be maintained.)
|
I note that the table also does not contain "throw", which appears in a throw-expression. What exactly breaks if co_await and throw are not present in preprocessing-op-or-punc? |
jensmaurer
added
the
decision-required
|
Editorial meeting: Not editorial. Covered by CWG 189 and CWG 1901. |
jensmaurer
removed
the
decision-required
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
co_awaitis missing from the list of preprocessing-op-or-punc. Since it is an operator likenewanddelete(see [over.oper]), it should be here, otherwise it would be an identifier in phases 3 through 6. This is a clear inconsistency.(I'm not certain about how to layout the table, as
co_awaitis almost too big to fit, but the existing patterns should be maintained.)