Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

consider moving description of Requires: element and [res.on.required]p1 to Annex D #3664

Closed
zygoloid opened this issue Feb 10, 2020 · 2 comments · Fixed by #3854
Closed
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@zygoloid
Copy link
Member

After the final "Mandating" paper is applied, we should consider moving description of the Requires: element and [res.on.required]p1 to Annex D (which should then contain all remaining uses of that element).

@zygoloid zygoloid added this to the C++20 milestone Feb 10, 2020
@AlisdairM
Copy link
Contributor

As part of a global review of deprecated features, paper P2139R0 in the post-Prague mailing provides wording to replace all Requires clauses in Annex D, remove the Requires: element from C++23. Clearly not a good answer for C++20 though, and not yet an approved direction.

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

Confirmed, all remaining \requires are in Annex D.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants