You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In Table 6, at the header of column 3, the order of type names of integer literals is not consistent, where “Binary” is placed before “octal” and “hexadecimal”, but at the other places, the order is always decimal, octal, hexadecimal and then binary, as in the syntax section.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Proposed approach: the order given here (increasing order of radix) is the most natural order. Reorder the other cases to match this order (binary, octal, decimal, hexadecimal).
DIS 14882:2014 NB comment JP 04:
In Table 6, at the header of column 3, the order of type names of integer literals is not consistent, where “Binary” is placed before “octal” and “hexadecimal”, but at the other places, the order is always decimal, octal, hexadecimal and then binary, as in the syntax section.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: