DIS 14882:2014 NB comment JP 06:

By N3652, the statement "The class of which .... a literal type (3.9)" remains, but it is removed in DIS. Please check whether the removal is intended or not.

Proposed change:

If it is intended, we think that the following part of the example should be removed because it is not related to this clause in DIS.

class debug_flag {
public:
  explicit debug_flag(bool);
  constexpr bool is_on() const;                // error: debug_flag not
                                       // literal type
private:
  bool flag;
};