Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Effects clauses contain sentences lacking a subject #373

Closed
zygoloid opened this issue Aug 22, 2014 · 1 comment
Closed

Effects clauses contain sentences lacking a subject #373

zygoloid opened this issue Aug 22, 2014 · 1 comment

Comments

@zygoloid
Copy link
Member

DIS 14882:2014 NB comment JP 13:

In 30.4.1.4/5,13,19,26, ...: Some semantics clauses, i.e. ‘Requires’, ‘Effects’, or ‘Postcondition’, lack a "subject". To clarify intent, it should be included in sentences.
@zygoloid
Copy link
Member Author

NAD. While this is a shorthand, the longer form "This function " adds no clarity over the current form "" and the current form is used regularly throughout the standard.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@zygoloid