[atomic] Minor corrections to atomic index #3730
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The index for the primary atomic template was split across two entries, atomic and atomic<T>. Reconciled into one. A couple of operations for atomic smart pointers are specificed in the primary template, but were missing the cross-reference into that specification, which is supplied in the same way for all the other atomic specializations.
I can't tell if there's a markup problem here or if this is British humor. |
|
Sorry, somewhere along the lines the angle brackets for atomic[T] got swallowed as a bad HTML tag - trying this comment with squared brackets to be safe... |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The index for the primary atomic template was split across
two entries, atomic and atomic. Reconciled into one.
A couple of operations for atomic smart pointers are
specificed in the primary template, but were missing the
cross-reference into that specification, which is supplied
in the same way for all the other atomic specializations.