Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CWG Poll 18: P1908R1 Reserving attribute namespaces for future use #3741

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 26, 2020

Conversation

jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

Fixes #3702.
Fixes cplusplus/papers#654.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added this to the post-2020-02 milestone Feb 18, 2020
@burblebee burblebee changed the title P1908R1 Reserving attribute namespaces for future use CWG Poll 18: P1908R1 Reserving attribute namespaces for future use Feb 23, 2020
Comment on lines +8515 to +8550
An \grammarterm{attribute-token} is reserved for future standardization if
\begin{itemize}
\item it is not an \grammarterm{attribute-scoped-token} and
not specified in this document, or
\item it is an \grammarterm{attribute-scoped-token} and
its \grammarterm{attribute-namespace} is
either \tcode{std} or \tcode{std} followed by one or more digits.
\end{itemize}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

#3127 suggests that a blank line should precede and follow each of these \items (note that I've interpreted that to include the \begin{itemize}/\end{itemize} as part of the first/last \item)

@zygoloid zygoloid merged commit a043552 into master Feb 26, 2020
@jensmaurer jensmaurer deleted the motions-2020-02-cwg-18 branch February 12, 2021 20:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants