You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
a defaulted destructor that is defined as deleted;
the notion of trivial destructors
They should have their own paragraphs.
The same applies in other places in clause 12: see, for instance, 12.1/4, which specifies
what a defaulted constructor is
when a default constructor is implicitly declared and how it behaves
when a defaulted default constructor is deleted
when a defaulted default constructor is trivial
I think at least (3) and (4) should be in their own paragraphs. I have no particular opinion about whether (1) and (2) should be split up, but my inclination is to keep them together since the fact that you implicitly get a default constructor in some cases is fairly fundamental to the notion of a default constructor.
12.8 paragraphs 7-12 are a bit better (the 'deleted' and 'trivial' determination are already in their own paragraphs), but paragraph 11 is a bit confused: its opening sentence is about implicitly-declared constructors ("...is an inline public member..."), but the rest of the paragraph is about implicitly deleting defaulted constructors, which happens for non-implicitly-declared constructors too. The opening sentence of paragraph 11 would fit much better in, say, paragraph 7.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
12.4p5 is fixed already.
I've split up (3) and (4) in 12.1p4.
The first sentence of 12.8p11 is not moved earlier, because the concept of an implicitly-declared move constructor is introduced as late as p9. p11 is the first place where we talk about both copy and move constructors. We could have a separate paragraph for the first sentence of p11, but that gets us a questionable paragraph with a single sentence. In short, no changes to 12.8p11.
From Gaby:
The same applies in other places in clause 12: see, for instance, 12.1/4, which specifies
I think at least (3) and (4) should be in their own paragraphs. I have no particular opinion about whether (1) and (2) should be split up, but my inclination is to keep them together since the fact that you implicitly get a default constructor in some cases is fairly fundamental to the notion of a default constructor.
12.8 paragraphs 7-12 are a bit better (the 'deleted' and 'trivial' determination are already in their own paragraphs), but paragraph 11 is a bit confused: its opening sentence is about implicitly-declared constructors ("...is an inline public member..."), but the rest of the paragraph is about implicitly deleting defaulted constructors, which happens for non-implicitly-declared constructors too. The opening sentence of paragraph 11 would fit much better in, say, paragraph 7.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: