You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I guess that \Cpp{} was introduced to avoid the hideous looking "++" with the PDF's font. There are plain "C++" that would look better if they were replaced with "\Cpp{}". check.sh should be enhanced to detect these. This may be obvious to pro LaTeX users, but pay attention to the index entries containing "C++". Some come from macro definitions like \defnx{\Cpp{} standard library}{library!C++ standard}, which should also replace the plain "C++" with "\Cpp{}" so that the index looks nice too.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Extended the automatic checks is hard, because some mentions of C++ are actually intentional, e.g. in extern "C++". Also, for index entries, there are two levels: one is the (sorting of) the index entry itself, and one is the presentation in the index. Only the latter can be replaced with the beautified macro.
I guess that
\Cpp{}
was introduced to avoid the hideous looking "++" with the PDF's font. There are plain "C++" that would look better if they were replaced with "\Cpp{}".check.sh
should be enhanced to detect these. This may be obvious to pro LaTeX users, but pay attention to the index entries containing "C++". Some come from macro definitions like\defnx{\Cpp{} standard library}{library!C++ standard}
, which should also replace the plain "C++" with "\Cpp{}" so that the index looks nice too.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: