Skip to content

7.1.5/3 and /4 define 'constraints' that are later referred to as 'requirements' #390

Closed
@zygoloid

Description

@zygoloid
Member

Suggestion from CWG is to change /3 and /4 to define "the requirements for a constexpr function/constructor"

Something like:

"The requirements for a constexpr function are: [...] The program is ill-formed if a constexpr function does not satisfy the requirements of a constexpr function."

Activity

zygoloid

zygoloid commented on Nov 5, 2014

@zygoloid
MemberAuthor

"[...] A constexpr function is ill-formed if it does not satisfy these requirements."

jensmaurer

jensmaurer commented on Dec 8, 2016

@jensmaurer
Member

This is already addressed in the current text. We say "shall satisfy the following requirements".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

        Participants

        @zygoloid@jensmaurer

        Issue actions

          7.1.5/3 and /4 define 'constraints' that are later referred to as 'requirements' · Issue #390 · cplusplus/draft