You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Suggestion from CWG is to change /3 and /4 to define "the requirements for a constexpr function/constructor"
Something like:
"The requirements for a constexpr function are: [...] The program is ill-formed if a constexpr function does not satisfy the requirements of a constexpr function."
Activity
zygoloid commentedon Nov 5, 2014
"[...] A constexpr function is ill-formed if it does not satisfy these requirements."
jensmaurer commentedon Dec 8, 2016
This is already addressed in the current text. We say "shall satisfy the following requirements".