New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Strike surviving mentions of "storage class" (outside of stable names and grammar) #3906
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please follow the rules at https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/wiki/Commit-message-format when naming your commits.
91a7d5e
to
ae76dfb
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
This needs a rebase + force-push, plus a small fix. |
@sdkrystian: Ping |
@jensmaurer @zygoloid @tkoeppe Apologies for the inactivity, school has kept me very busy and unable to do much wg21 related work. At the end of the semester (little over a week) I'll be able to address everything that needs changes or rebasing. |
@sdkrystian: Ping^2 |
@sdkrystian: Ping^3 |
…entions of "storage class"
@jensmaurer @tkoeppe Very sorry for disappearing for the last few years. Rebased, updated commit message, and applied suggested wording. |
No need to apologize! And thanks for the contribution! |
Outside of the grammar term and first paragraph of [dcl.stc], "storage class" has no meaning in C++, and has no need to be defined. This replaces mentions of "storage class" with storage-class-specifier, "storage duration" and "linkage" where appropriate.