Correctly annotate keywords #3908
Conversation
| Explicit declaration is increasingly considered | ||
| to be proper style. | ||
| Liaison with WG14 (C) indicated support for (at least) | ||
| deprecating implicit int in the next revision of C. | ||
| deprecating implicit \tcode{int} in the next revision of C. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we can say something more current here; it's been a long time since C was considering deprecation.
@AaronBallman What's the status quo with C17 and C2x? Can you suggest something suitable?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Implicit int was removed in C99 (WG14 N635 N661 N692 N722), so at this point, we can just say it's incompatible with C.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So, we should just drop this entire entry: There is (no longer) any incompatibility, because implicit int is not a thing in (current) C and not in C++. We refer to ISO 9899:2018 in the front matter, btw.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"implicit int" will be removed by #5088
zygoloid
added
the
changes requested
sdkrystian
force-pushed
the
patch-47
branch
2 times, most recently
from
3a2fb6e
to
9cf45d4
Compare
jensmaurer
removed
the
changes requested
|
Please use \keyword for keywords, which also helps with index entries. Also, some of the drive-by fixes should be in separate commits. |
|
@jensmaurer Sorry! I'll make sure to use \keyword for all future changes (apologies for you having to repeat yourself on 3 different PRs!). I'll split the drive-by edits into separate commits. |
zygoloid
added
the
changes requested
jensmaurer
added
the
needs rebase
|
This needs a rebase + force-push, plus some attention to the latest review comments. |
|
@sdkrystian , ping |
Fixed a few instances of keywords not being properly annotated.