Skip to content

[expr.spaceship] Clarify treatment of pointers. #3958

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2020

Conversation

jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

@jensmaurer jensmaurer commented Apr 25, 2020

Fixes #3956.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer requested a review from zygoloid April 25, 2020 20:49
@zygoloid zygoloid added the changes requested Changes to the wording or approach have been requested and not yet applied. label Sep 18, 2020
@zygoloid zygoloid added this to the C++23 milestone Sep 18, 2020
@jensmaurer jensmaurer removed the changes requested Changes to the wording or approach have been requested and not yet applied. label Sep 19, 2020
@jensmaurer jensmaurer requested a review from zygoloid September 19, 2020 06:04
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member Author

Rebased again to fix Travis failure.

@zygoloid zygoloid merged commit a85ec26 into cplusplus:master Oct 18, 2020
@jensmaurer jensmaurer deleted the c14 branch October 18, 2020 15:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[expr.spaceship]: Wording should be clearer that function pointers don't do <=>
2 participants