Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

library index not exactly in alphabetical order #398

Closed
zygoloid opened this issue Nov 11, 2014 · 2 comments
Closed

library index not exactly in alphabetical order #398

zygoloid opened this issue Nov 11, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@zygoloid
Copy link
Member

emplace, deque
push_front, deque
push_back, deque

are randomly collated between

input_iterator_tag

and

insert_after, forward_list
@AlisdairM
Copy link
Contributor

This seems to be a deliberate decision in creating those index entries as related to 'insert' - I stumbled over this when cleaning up other mis-sortings due to use of '\tcode' in:
#741

This happens to be the one mis-filing I chose not to fix, as the use of 'insert@' in the index entry appears intentional - although I don't think that idiom is repeated anywhere else, and I would be happy to fix this too.

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

This particular issue is fixed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants