Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[thread.syn] Don't mandate including <initializer_list> when including <thread> #3991

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 23, 2020
Merged

Conversation

frederick-vs-ja
Copy link
Contributor

Fix #3988

@frederick-vs-ja frederick-vs-ja changed the title Don't mandate including <initializer_list> when including <thread> [thread.syn] Don't mandate including <initializer_list> when including <thread> May 10, 2020
@jensmaurer jensmaurer merged commit f258f94 into cplusplus:master May 23, 2020
jensmaurer pushed a commit to jensmaurer/draft that referenced this pull request May 23, 2020
…ng <thread> (cplusplus#3991)

This was accidentally introduced while applying
LWG3330 Include <compare> from most library headers.
@frederick-vs-ja frederick-vs-ja deleted the patch-4 branch May 23, 2020 15:46
zygoloid pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2020
…ng <thread> (#3991)

This was accidentally introduced while applying
LWG3330 Include <compare> from most library headers.
tkoeppe pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2020
…ng <thread> (#3991)

This was accidentally introduced while applying
LWG3330 Include <compare> from most library headers.
tkoeppe pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2020
…ng <thread> (#3991)

This was accidentally introduced while applying
LWG3330 Include <compare> from most library headers.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[thread.syn] Should <thread> include <initializer_list>?
3 participants