Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Excessive paragraph indentation throughout [concepts.lang] #4046

Open
W-E-Brown opened this issue Jun 17, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Excessive paragraph indentation throughout [concepts.lang] #4046

W-E-Brown opened this issue Jun 17, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
decision-required A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required.

Comments

@W-E-Brown
Copy link
Contributor

Looking at N4861, all paragraphs following a code block defining a concept seem excessively indented throughout subclause [concepts.lang].

The 1st example of this seems to be [concept.same]/1.

[concept.commonref]/2 and /3 demonstrate that multiple paragraphs are affected, but only after a code block, as /1, before the code block, seems correctly indented.
@CaseyCarter
Copy link
Contributor

I obviously can't tell anyone what they think does or doesn't look good, but this is at least expected.

This is the "normal" indentation that results from using the itemdescr environment for the specification of the declaration in an accompanying itemdecl environment. itemdescrs are indented substantially relative to plain text paragraphs. The end of [vector.bool] shows similar indentation:

image

There are "normal" paragraphs in the first section (which I've delimited in red) with very little indent, and then alternative itemdecls (green) with similar indent and itemdescrs (blue) with their larger indent.

@JohelEGP
Copy link
Contributor

I think this is related to #2528 and #2648, in that concepts don't have their own descriptive elements like (template) functions do.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added the decision-required A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required. label Jun 17, 2020
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

To clarify, this is not a LaTeX bug/accident, but directly caused by the LaTeX constructs used in the descriptions. But we don't seem to be consistent: [concept.swappable] p4 is not indented, surprisingly.
Plus the extra indent does look a bit odd, absent the special library description introducers.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
decision-required A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@CaseyCarter @W-E-Brown @JohelEGP @jensmaurer