Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[everywhere] Stop talking about C++ International Standards. #4198

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 16, 2020

Conversation

zygoloid
Copy link
Member

As far as ISO is concerned, there is only one International Standard for
C++, and in any case, we don't mean the document here, we mean the
language in the abstract and don't care whether that's an ISO standard
or not. Refer to "revisions of C++" instead of revisions of particular
ISO documents.

Partially addresses ISO/CS 016 (C++20 DIS).

Copy link
Contributor

@tkoeppe tkoeppe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems like a reasonable change, both for clarity and for sidestepping the ISO drafting rule.

Copy link
Member

@jensmaurer jensmaurer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some LaTeX-level consistency concerns. Otherwise fine.

source/compatibility.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source/compatibility.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source/compatibility.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source/compatibility.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source/compatibility.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source/compatibility.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source/future.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source/future.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source/future.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source/utilities.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@zygoloid zygoloid added the ballot-comment Response to an NB or ISO comment on a ballot label Sep 16, 2020
As far as ISO is concerned, there is only one International Standard for
C++, and in any case, we don't mean the document here, we mean the
language in the abstract and don't care whether that's an ISO standard
or not. Refer to "revisions of C++" instead of revisions of particular
ISO documents.

Partially addresses ISO/CS 016 (C++20 DIS).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ballot-comment Response to an NB or ISO comment on a ballot
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants