New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[expr] Use 'qualification-combined' and 'qualification-decomposition'. #4314
Conversation
@jensmaurer: Do you think changing the terms-of-art here is sufficiently editorial? |
I could ask CWG in their next meeting, to make sure. |
@jensmaurer: Yes please, I would welcome that. I can compile a list of high-interest GitHub issues if you like. The change looks valuable, but it'd be good to have some official sign-off. |
Put on CWG's plate: |
2021-05-03 decomposition -> qualification-decomposition |
The previous names 'cv-combined' and 'cv-decomposition' are no longer adequate since a qualification conversion can now convert to an array of unknown bounds.
@tkoeppe, this should be ready now. |
Thanks, I'll take a look! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, thank you!
The previous names 'cv-combined' and 'cv-decomposition' are
no longer adequate since a qualification conversion can now
convert to an array of unknown bounds.
Fixes #3088