Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LWG Poll 8: P0943R6 Support C atomics in C++ #4372

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Dec 14, 2020
Merged

Conversation

jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

source/atomics.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source/atomics.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@burblebee burblebee left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for fixing! FYI, we only use the \Cpp macro when referring to the language or the spec; I don't know why it was added, given that we don't have a similar macro for C.

@JohelEGP
Copy link
Contributor

It's because plain C++ doesn't look well rendered.

@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit 20c41d3 into master Dec 14, 2020
@jensmaurer jensmaurer deleted the motions-2020-11-lwg-8 branch June 14, 2021 21:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[2020-11 LWG Motion 8] P0943R6 Support C atomics in C++ P0943 Support C atomics in C++
4 participants